www.heavensgatel2.fora.pl

[jllchflo]

->
SAN FRANCISCO March 24 morning news, informed sources in the digital book by the United States Court rejected the settlement agreement, Google may consider Congress legislative process to address the digital book business obstacles encountered, which may be consistent with the interests of all solutions.
remaining options

with the judge rejected Google Books settlement agreement, the company left the choice of less and less. Google and the Association of American Publishers and the Writers Guild of America on Wednesday began evaluating alternatives to determine whether they should continue to work, or once again become the enemy.
seems unlikely the two sides to reach a new settlement agreement. The original settlement agreement allows Google to scan and provide all outside of books have been published, but is a U.S. federal judge on Tuesday, Chen Zhuoguang (Denny Chin) rejected, as it took 7 years from the latest twist in a lawsuit.

Pamela Samuelson) said. However, she believes that because Google has scanned 15 million books Oakley Lifestyle Sunglasses, it is not possible to give up. They can withdraw or restart the original copyright lawsuit against Google.
to informed sources Oakley Sport Sunglasses, taking into account that the lawsuit has been put into the time and money, it is unlikely to drop the case Publishers Association. But several analysts have said the Association of American Publishers do not want to court.
Another option is with Google to reach a new settlement agreement requires that each author or copyright holder to choose whether to allow Google to their digital works. American publishers and writers on Wednesday said it intends to adopt the program.
Chen Zhuoguang judge also said that if the two sides reached this agreement will alleviate many of his concerns.
) said.
promote legislation

Google declined to comment Wednesday Oakley Sunglasses, but the company had previously said writer and copyright owner to submit permit independent approach is not feasible. Informed sources said that Google is not interested in such an agreement because it already shared with Google allows publishers to launch more digital books, and the initial focus of the settlement agreement is automatically authorized large number of books.
the original settlement had also given several million orphans Google exclusive access to books. And if you agree to submit to the copyright owner authorized independent, Google will lose these books, because the copyright owner is not clear.
scholars estimate that orphan works about half of all books. Which contains a number of privately published autobiography, as well as academic institutions and researchers is essential and is stored in the University library books.
the U.S. Copyright Office report in 2006 suggested that, if unsuccessful efforts to find the copyright owner, they should be allowed free use of orphan works. Driven by this report, Congress has twice considered orphan works legislation to solve the problem. But Sam Wilson said that as the policy makers are waiting for Google Books result of the settlement agreement, so the legislative process to be suspended.
Chen Zhuoguang verdict that the judge, for the use of orphan works to establish a mechanism to develop more suitable for the Congress, not the courts.
promote public access to orphan works, it is very pleased the court rejected the settlement agreement, and that it will open up a path through the legislation for all use of these books, not just Google.
MTD curator Robert Benton (Robert Darnton) said.
Google has previously supported such legislation, but informed sources expect Google is also actively called on Congress to legislate.
Digital Library of the U.S. non-profit Internet Archive's lawyers against Google Hadrian Katz (Hadrian R. Katz) that this may be the only authorized parties can access the program. (Seasonal)


Historical pattern of large investment prospects u

U.S. Embassy _ Sina blog