www.heavensgatel2.fora.pl

[logoxgvb]

Study: Abandoning _2404
About \Of: Abandoned


About \
??????????????????Study: Abandoning
????????????????? Original starting in 2009-05-16?? Popularity: 2974
I have said before: democracy and the system are two irreconcilable concepts, combining the concept of force in these two together is an insult to democracy.
This is because I say with the \Do not hard to accept, it is natural to say that defiance would bring a different comments and the views of these different views and opinions, I have looked and looked in detail, analyzes and analysis Therefore, only then so long to write this article.
have said that democracy and system are inseparable.
\and system, \For the understanding of these two concepts, each with their own views and ideas, views on democracy and the views of the system, in their mind there are many differences, these differences will bring together a wide range of ideas . But, if we put for the \That is, I said,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], \an insult to democracy.
if we want these two together, it is only \Perhaps many will say, \In fact, this statement is unscientific, to say too much is that out of context, or the sophistry.
system is produced under the wishes of democracy, this system is the \as \
democracy is produced under the system of charity, this kind of democracy is the \or given. For example: in the cultural field of democracy, the ruling class can give people the right to freedom of expression, but also to deprive people the right to freedom of speech, of course, reservations can be given and deprivation, that depends on the ruling position of the ruling class is not endangered, or by the degree of harm to the decision not based on the people (democracy) to achieve the requirements.
So, democracy and the system are two different concepts, one is to produce the \Democracy is the \it, eat its consequences.
There are like in the \uniform standard, this argument is very persuasive on the surface.
system is the need to develop, it can be one of the few to develop, it can be most to develop. Let us not discuss the minority to a majority of the formulation and development of quality problems, this sequence alone can be easily seen, is it a \or \This is the real upside.
have said: the decision must be a system of society, then democracy ... ... I wonder what this means? Is not referring to the? If you are referring to this, then we can easily refuted.
\system limits the kind of complete freedom.
just such a system in the development of democracy under the overall harmony of their reluctance to accept and abide by, had never expected the system of the constraints, therefore, use \is clearly \
If the conversion point of saying this to say: the decision of the ruling class must be a system, after the Democratic ... ... Well,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], I do not have any objection to the.
because the ruling class is self-interest of the (evil), so the system must be developed to limit the freedom of the ruling class, and then given according to the needs of the ruling class democracy.
democracy and the interests of access to these are two different concepts, we focus on vested interests, it is the nature with their associated, face I said \That is the truth.
with the interests of democracy and get access to different levels of understanding, the spirit and substance of the fight is not the same, when we talk about democracy to survive in the face of time, not as a provide them with food.
because of that: The key question is not whether or not to \is not a form, or is not a democratic form of communication to the general public, what is the relationship?
that the \cheap sell, as long as you give me a bowl of noodles in soup, so I might not starve to death, I'll vote.
agree some kind of \
world progress, democracy is also progressive, democratic system of diverse,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], vague shapes of each house their own political, social and cultural characteristics of democracy is its decision to the basic principles rather than a specific form. Democratic elections will not be a dictator at home or a single administration of the facade decoration, but the public support for the real competition, this \
maximize democratic right to reflect the degree of openness of a family, in their pursuit of democracy embodied in the self-maximizing the value of democracy is not the maximization of liberalization, but democracy The ultimate goal to pursue. If you are satisfied with the democracy,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and that society will stand still, history will be back.
in the \How much? How to? I have said a lot of face, and not repeat them.
our political system is often referred to a hope for democracy, governance reform and opening up from the first day of the second generation of leadership that the political system. However, the real political system in which a concrete manifestation of it? Finally we got the information that the top leadership of the CPPCC position: under the leadership of the ruling ... ... consistent.
lot of things in our \might as well do not say, because few of the \
have said: Chinese-style democracy is the emphasis on moderation. According to my understanding, this Chinese-style democracy that is my face said, \
have said: \, so how can service communist control it?
It makes me feel sad,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], democracy is democracy, why democracy is less arm broken it? It should be longer robust better! \If one, a government representative, he did have to have contempt, his behavior has been with their opposition, how do we worship? And how reverence to the \

相关的主题文章：


[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]