nlwxpearo
Joined: 13 Dec 2010
Posts: 520
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5
Location: England
|
 Posted: Wed 11:20, 16 Mar 2011 Post subject: Sulperazon the treatment efficacy of lower respira |
|
|
Sulperazon the treatment efficacy of lower respiratory tract infection
* 274 * 1995 l4 Medicine No. 6 9O. O. Small seedling type and negative after treatment in Table 3. Treatment of lower respiratory tract failure 3SLP fine Cao Xue Chai negative rate fell 2.3 toxicity and side effects 1 after using the SLP a transient serum aminotransferase A (SGPT) increased slightly, there loose stools, nausea, and 1 down, symptoms were lost after stopping take along. 9.43 The incidence of adverse events to discuss the evaluation of efficacy of 3.1-lactamase antibiotics can be hydrolyzed lactam ring amide tendons, internal lactam antibiotics of bacterial resistance to the main mechanism. This solid, its agents and 3rd generation cephalosporins associated application platform is a reasonable idea. Car group patients were older (mean age 67.zy), immune function is poor, most of them difficult to treat COPD, pulmonary heart disease and lung infection, lung cancer and obstructive pneumonia, with more such as coronary heart disease, diabetes, high blood disease. l6'd antibiotics ineffective in other cases, the use Shu satisfactory treatment efficacy of celecoxib Exploration} l6 down because of another severe illness, complications. Base body condition is poor, the beginning of the treatment given to SLP, but also achieve a satisfactory effect, and in the treatment process and after stopping concurrent fungal infection were not found. It seems with the drug quick, short course related. We believe that the elderly are more serious lower respiratory tract infections, particularly hospital acquired infections. SLP may be the preferred treatment. This can improve efficacy, but also to avoid the lower respiratory tract infections with other antibiotics is safe and reliable 3.2SLP antibacterial activity Donghe Liang and other findings,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], SLP can 62.8 of cefoperazone, cefotaxime a carboxymethyl oxime cephalosporin cefotaxime, ceftriaxone-resistant bacteria recruits and restore the sensitivity of G I to 55.5 for cefoperazone-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae restore the sensitivity of regulation, 100% recovery of nitrate-negative bacilli sensitivity,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], 68. 8 pus bacillus restore the sensitivity of the explosion. SIP on the production of glycosaminoglycans which dipped in the bacterial sterilization County has more sputum of patients with this train down zo 6 2O pathogenic strains of seedlings to G bacteria dominated. Tip G-bacilli hospital acquired infection in patients with COPD and pulmonary heart disease play a leading role in respiratory tract infections. Upon treatment of patients after l8 down by the Tourism Bureau sip negative bacteria, inhibition rate of 9o, the total effective resistance to the infection of 90.6, suggesting that SIP is an effective broad-spectrum antibiotics. 3.3SLP side effects reported, SLP common side effects were diarrhea (2.9) Others have nausea, vomiting,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], skin rashes, increased eosinophils, and drug fever. Occasional elevated S-GPT, were mild and reversible. Upon l down in 32 cases had transient S · GPT increases,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], loose stools, nausea, the】 cases disappeared after treatment, liver and kidney function, blood electrolytes, ECG abnormalities were not found loop checks. We believe that, SLP is a toxic side effects,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], safety of large broad-spectrum antibiotics. 4
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|
