www.heavensgatel2.fora.pl

[nlwxpearo]

Organizational Change Thinking Systems Science


Management Organizational change is an important subject of theoretical research, but also an important practical issue. Driven by the impact of practice, many empirical studies are general and specific methods of operation of the summary. These studies have certain business practices for guidance, but the lack of a general, overall refinement of the theory. This article will try to use the theory of system science research enterprise to integrate organizational change. Organizational change occurs organizational change is to adapt to changes in the external environment, and to improve and enhance organizational effectiveness as the fundamental purpose of management activities. Changes in the external environment is the greatest incentive for organizational change. Plastic using the system environment interaction analysis of symbiotic organizational theory of change can happen. According to this theory, the environment of the system has two inputs: resources and pressure; system on the environment, there are two outputs: Functional and pollution. Chinese papers League finishing. Input directly to shape corporate environmental organizations, the input directly trigger a change in organizational change. On organization, the environment of its major input of resources including human resources, capital and natural resources; environment, its pressure input mainly from the factor markets and commodities (services) market competition. If the business environment which is rich in resources, or capital adequacy, or the abundant labor resources, then the enterprise should select the resource-intensive or capital-intensive or labor-intensive pattern of organization. When the environment changes, companies need to change organizational model accordingly. Meanwhile, the environmental pressures also influence the choice of organizational mode. If the factor market, fierce competition exists, then the organizational structure must have a higher factor than the competitors use efficiency. If the product (service) market competition, then the business must have to produce more products to meet market demand structure. From the perspective of system science, the enterprise's output also shape the effects on the environment. When the enterprise's output impact on the environment, the environment changes and thus will generate new business input, giving rise to organizational change. Company's main function is to provide products and services to market, increase equity, and turned over to the state tax. If the enterprise provide the market with quality products and services, business market share increased, so we can gain a competitive advantage, reduce competitive pressures. If big business is the government's tax revenue, it will be able to get more from the government support and benefits. If the business can continue to bring business owners a higher return on investment, you'll be more likely to attract more capital. Enterprises will help to improve the function of the output business environment, and thus help relieve the external pressure, and promote the healthy development organization. In contrast, the output will worsen pollution company's own business environment. Pollution of the natural environment, we have sufficient knowledge. In addition, there are other types of pollution. Enterprises do not respect the staff, even against the security and interests of employees, then no one is to the enterprises can be said that industrial pollution of its own human resources environment. Corporate investment decision-making unreasonable, poor management, increasing the value of the assets can not be achieved, it will lose the trust of the majority of investors. Enterprises will be very difficult to get more money, can be said that its financing business environment deteriorated. Deterioration of the environment will generate new business pressure, which requires changes in business organizations. Sum up, the environment for enterprise resource input to determine the form of business organization; environmental pressure on companies enter the restricted choice of business organizations; business function output is conducive to improving the business environment; business will worsen the pollution output of enterprises business environment. Organizational change mode selection need for organizational change, there is such a popular understanding: business or implement change or perish. However, is not always the case, some companies were changes, but to speed up the destruction. This involves the selection of organizational change models. This comparison of these two typical models of organizational change: radical change and gradual change. Seek radical change in a short time, large enterprise organizations, a comprehensive adjustment of the initial state in order to completely break the organizational model and establish the purpose of state organizational model. Incremental changes are minor by local organizations to adjust, through a gradual process and strive to achieve the purpose of the initial state organizational model to changes in state organizational model. Radical changes to achieve their goals faster rate state, because this model of organization change is a substantial adjustment, comprehensive, can be described as large overshoot, so the process of change will be more fast; At the same time, overshoot the smooth organization of the General Assembly led to poor results when severe tissue collapse. This is why many companies to accelerate organizational change but the reasons for destruction of the enterprise. In contrast, continued to rely on incremental changes, minor changes to achieve the goal state, that is, small overshoot, but the volatility more often, change the duration of long, this will help maintain the stability of the organization. Two models have advantages and disadvantages, but also have a wealth of practical, business should be based on the capacity of organizations to select corporate organizational change model. Radical changes in practice is a typical Since reform and opening to meet the requirements of market economy, many domestic enterprises have done a lot of management innovation and organizational innovation. In order to overcome the conservative organization, the practice of some enterprises to take full in the organization laid off, and then re-competition mode of change. In this way a bit extreme, but the system reflects the deep thinking. Stability is essential for the organization, but when business leaders ahead of the poor awareness of employees trapped in the status quo when the super-stable structure, business organizations will tend to rigid, conservative, and will affect the organization's development. At this point, not enough to break the small disturbance stability of the initial state, it is difficult to achieve the purpose of state. And through further competition, to stimulate enthusiasm and the work of employees of enterprises concerned, as long as the competition is fair, just, open, and to help form a new attractor, the organization toward a new stable state. Such changes if successful, the results have thoroughness. The key is in the process create a new attractor, such as new business objectives, new market positioning, new incentive and restraint mechanisms and so on. If you break the stability of the existing organization, you can not create a new attractor as soon as possible, then the organization will be limited to chaos and even destruction. And should be aware of change is only a means to improve organizational effectiveness is the goal. If in order to change and change, so will influence the normal functioning. Progressive change is through the local repair and adjustment to achieve. A U.S. aircraft manufacturing company, including the original product is only four types of helicopters. Each helicopter has a specific purpose. From the technical point of view, no two aircraft are identical, that is, the degree of difference between products large degree of standardization is low. In the fierce competitive market conditions, this mode of production is not conducive to economies of scale. In order to gain competitive advantage, the company decided to change organizational model. The specific measure is to adjust the combination of departments. First of all, the designers from a variety of models to design a basic model so that it can with a variety of accessories (such as: guns, bombs launchers, electronic control devices, etc.) and flexible portfolio to meet the needs of different customers . Then the factory has production experience of the staff together in the production of the basic models. Engaged in various types of special parts of the original production staff,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], according to the new design is still the professional production of various accessories. In this way, through internal adjustments, both conducive to mass production, but also to meet the diverse needs of the market. This change in the way the organization produces less vibration, and can regularly, partially adjusted, until the objective state. The disadvantage of this approach is that reform prone to path dependence, leading to long-term business organizations can not get rid of the shackles of the old mechanism.