 Posted: Fri 17:09, 31 Dec 2010 Post subject: About subordinate to (1 + z) ^ 2 (1-z) ^ 2 measur |
|
| About subordinate to (1 + z) ^ 2 / (1-z) ^ 2 measure of that class of functions
= (Posts down or a (Ze left at about equality was established. To prove that only prove the left inequality, the proof of the right and the left inequality similar to if it is in a [,Mont Blanc pens, the probability measure, and (1) said that, then P [d (=) ≥ hit Rain 1 - r, == e''∈ Therefore,p90x workout schedule, by (2) of [proof] (5)-IIl ● 168 Shenyang Institute of Chemical Technology 1992 Ang az (Lan a -) = When (4) where =,Botas UGG Bailey Button, the left of the equation corresponding to equation (5), because one by one I A, I-r trunk zo = roe ~ o,ecco golf shoes, equation (5) the conditions established for the unit point Set ~ iCOo + \= l + -4 = Re 『pJ0P 'by the following examples discussed Corollary 3. (Example 1) ORDER) = sales,north face outlet, nr (e) = to + buckle e = e (a -) P: A. gfl a 2 Ⅱ 2 Ji l A concave), when r converges to a 1:00 therefore (1 - log2 - logIsL ~ 21). l + z = (1 + a ze-. ~ tJ (1 - 1og2 - 1og1I Dan 2l A = Jo \ a-tJ '(Example 2) calculation; Order )=()<),' 2. ・ I Xuan Lei Yue Ⅱ mining} 3 D effect: on from the session in (1 + =) t / (1 - z) ~ class of functions that I69 which measure 2m () = 1 + ÷ marrow = 1 +2 Re [(] Police r: dJD (1 A e), .2 P (1 a) 2P (1 - -c ~) ten Kenichi:: T 『= 1 +()+()( B) = a 2 (i one by one _ b i) = a ÷ + in LJ) in the sense that when r converges to a 1 a ÷ addition, you can see the c Dirty South as a 1, it converges weakly, in which one unit of the original root, as the focus point of the unit elements in a collection of fact, if g ∈ c (au), then there Lu and twist. If J a ■ l 』a r-1 rl a while, it converges to the police g (e). because the Poisson integral of kernel is an approximate identity (see [3]), so too Σ1-4 = 170 Shenyang Institute of Chemical Technology 1992 = c a {strike + ancient flea a result, get, (z) the expression: (1 + Old Lu (poor) \ a 』B '\ A =』 This Identities can also be proved by elementary operations |
|
